You know, too regularly it appears like Android smartphone producers aren't taking note of our desires (or at very least, our properly priorities). We're the ones buying the phones after all!
I wager that's no longer fully reasonable. I suggest, my desires could be distinctive from yours. however undergo with me right here. As of late, leading smartphones have a little reached a plateau, haven't they? We're no longer (in giant) clamoring for faster processors or more resolution. for this reason, chances are high that our wants, as an entire, are simpler than ever to assess.
Let's do this: I'll record the right five things i'd inform an o.e.m to prioritize in their subsequent flagship. I'm betting that almost all Android clients will agree.
Battery
We desire our telephones to final. There's no factor in packing all these neat features into a phone if it runs out of battery. The battery has to be the exact precedence.
i will't aid but factor my finger at Samsung on this point. closing yr, it revamped the Galaxy line with a lots needed makeover. except, the Galaxy S6 had terrible battery life. here is just incorrect. A company who places battery life on the sideline for a further feature is making a foul play. disgrace, disgrace on a giant like Samsung for now not realizing enhanced.
Let's talk with our wallets and not purchase into a negligence to battery life. on the excessive cost of flagships, we shouldn't should settle. If we don't have the means to swap the battery anymore, than we deserve to see considerably colossal capacities in flagships. Screw thinness, battery existence matters so a lot extra.
digital camera Optical ZoomCameras on flagship telephones are remarkable nowadays. remaining yr, I did comparisons with the Galaxy S6 and LG V10 in opposition t a Sony RX100 digicam. The effects were extraordinary in case you think about how small the smartphone sensors are in assessment to a dedicated camera.
This ability we can are count on smartphone cameras more than ever for shooting the life around us. however zooming is frequently linked to digicam use, and digital zoom is fairly horrendous. Digital zooming is in reality cropping, and the decrease in image best suggests in a big means, even on the most reliable existing smartphone cameras.
For an illustration, I'll exhibit you a preview of my upcoming LG V10 vs Asus ZenFone Zoom comparison. The ZenFone Zoom has 3x optical zoom, and the advantage is somewhat clear.
LG V10, 3x zoom
Asus ZenFone Zoom, 3x zoom
OEMs are doubtless reluctant about incorporating optical zoom as a result of camera modules are already thicker than they want. all and sundry likes to whinge in regards to the camera hump on the iPhone and Galaxy series. That capability here is an argument about mobile thinness once again, and that i would gladly take a thicker cellphone if it meant improved features.
more base storage
We've taken this BS long ample. Why can we still see instruments released with 16GB and even 32GB of inner storage? whereas storage space has progressed for everything else available in the market (solid-state drives, flash drives, SD cards), OEMs proceed to brief change us. All while many have gotten rid of micro-SD expansion on telephones. here is an injustice.
I see many individuals say that the low inside storage isn't a large deal, that they could manage. but we should still neither have to manipulate nor settle. OEMs are pulling a fast one on us and we continue to allow them to. They comprehend they can encompass plenty higher cupboard space, but don't. perhaps they're banking on us buying a new cellphone anytime we run out?
durability
Fragile phones simply don't make experience. They're at all times in our arms, which ability that gravity will declare them at some element. They should be designed to withstand accidents.
traditionally, long lasting telephones were reserved for low/mid-conclusion offerings from lesser frequent manufacturers (i.e. Kyocera). however I've all the time questioned why it has to be this manner? sure, we've considered some big manufacturers step as much as the plate, just like the Galaxy S energetic line (which alas has AT&T exclusivity), but they are too few and far between.
another decent illustration is Sony. while the Xperia line isn't necessarily rugged, it has all the time had water and mud proofing. Motorola additionally had the appropriate concept with last year's Droid faster 2 and its "shatterproof" reveal.
a part of the issue comes round to thinness once again. adding durability raises thickness. OEMs need to let go of the thin mobilephone mentality.
Toned-down UI's
extra OEMs should step up to the plate like Motorola did with reference to cell software. mobilephone makers like to pile on their personal touches to Android, so as to stand out. The difficulty is that only a few make an attractive person interface (UI).
as an example, Samsung's TouchWiz UI has long been notorious in the Android group for useless changes to the stock Android UI and being aid hungry. final yr's Galaxy S6 had a big challenge with multitasking, where it closed down apps seconds from leaving it. That isn't how Android become made to behave.
All these cost-effective choices coming from chinese language OEMs nowadays are compelling however bittersweet. bound, you'll be getting hundreds price, nonetheless it's just about certain the UI can be heavy and/or subpar. How I desire that there have been more OEMs that would adopt Motorola's methodology – near stock Android with some enhancements. Android fanatics need the stock UI.
We'd want to hear your feedback. Do you agree with my right 5 list of issues cellphone makers should prioritize nowadays, or is there a different function that you simply believe takes priority?
ConversionConversion EmoticonEmoticon