Some apps in the Google Play store may be getting slightly greater leeway from Google than others. One redditor currently concentrated on the ordinary app SongFlip and wondered why it became being allowed to stay within the Google Play save.
There are a couple of very usual apps in the Google Play store which can be blatantly breaking many Google Play guidelines (developer guidelines). Why is Google refusing to eliminate them and ignoring all reviews against them? I believe something sinister is occurring involving former Google employees.
for instance, check out SongFlip (https://play.google.com/store/apps/particulars?identification=com.hypermedia.songflip), which has at once develop into the #16 overall App within the country (and a good app in lots of different countries), which means it is with ease making over $30,000 per day from ad revenue and is getting in regards to the equal number of daily downloads as Spotify (#14 normal). SongFlip is blatantly breaking many Google Play guidelines and violating copyrights...
My query is why is Google allowing some very everyday apps like SongFlip to break so many rules? might it be the case that the SongFlip creator, who is a former Google employee, is using contacts inside Google to evade it from being taken down despite so many violations? we can only speculate...
by way of mysteriously enabling it to proceed breaking guidelines and violate highbrow property and ignoring all experiences against the app, Google has allowed it to at once turn into the #sixteen typical app in the country, which skill it is making over $30,000 per day in ad earnings and is as accepted as Spotify (#14 general app).
more at Reddit
His fellow redditors shared their suggestions about why Google may be letting some developers get away with more than others:
Tetsuo666: "I consider it be a bit too early to assert that Google is voluntarily letting this app continue to exist on the PlayStore.
For me Google is relatively infamous for buying/growing capabilities that generates a ton of consumer generated content (Youtube, PlayStore, pictures, G+). The aspect is none of those capabilities makes use of suitable moderators to control the content. or not it's relatively an awful lot entirely dealt with by using a hord of bots greater or less accurate when aiming their goals.
likelihood is this developper simply acquired truly first rate at averting the algorithm controlling those bots. eventually one of the crucial two people at Google's moderating/abuse crew may still see the subject and act on it."
Atb1183: "...raising the entry charge to posting an app won't help both considering he is raking in $$$. Two options exist:
1) walled garden like apple 2) heuristic scanning of apps upon submission
2 is doubtless what they should still do already anyway to reduce again malware (no longer simply virus but crappy behaviors as well)."
QuestionsEverythang: "i ponder if he is also opening a brand new bank account to link his Google merchant account to (to assemble his cash) or if he is the usage of his same checking account and Google, with all their bots, are unable to peer that every one these malicious debts are linked to the equal bank account. "
Flirpcannon: "Google let a...malware app hit the precise 5 listing earlier than they intervened. That may still sum up their oversight pretty nicely."
MyRealUser: "for the same reason eBay is allowing many massive dealers blatantly violate many of their suggestions (deceptive titles, key phrases unsolicited mail, listing dissimilar distinctive items under the identical record to show up as most cost-effective, and so on). They make lots of cash off these shady practices."
LongUsername: "you are a soundcloud musician so I count on this app is violating your copyright under #three. have you looked at sending Google a DMCA request towards the App? i am now not bound exactly if it could work as the app itself as hosted by using google isn't a copyright violation, but a facilitator of copyright violation.
The other option is that you have the name and location of the writer: Sue him for copyright violations. You can also wish to remove the links to his LinkedIn/G+ account as it can be considered as encouraging harassment of him over this concern and skirts close to a bannable offense on Reddit."
TheReal: "meanwhile AdBlockers and Youtube background players are banned inside seconds."
MangoScango: "No. These policies don't seem to be comparable. Google disallows apps to interfere with other apps content. so you can not do gadget extensive Adblocking because you're breaking other apps.
Apple allows for Adblocking of their browser. it's it. Google does too, albeit Chrome doesn't assist extensions on Android yet. but any one can put up a browser with Adblocking. Apple would never allow gadget extensive Adblocking either."
Sephr: "Requiring clients to rate 5 stars is against the suggestions, however do note that you just should not have to observe SoundCloud's API terms and conditions if you simply scrape the site as a substitute of the usage of the API. I don't know if it truly is what this app does, however's vital to understand that it is viable to make this app with out breaking SoundCloud's API phrases."
Keaukraine: "mainly, because they just don't care. however simply are attempting publishing AdMob advert blockers to Google Play... :)"
extra at Reddit
ConversionConversion EmoticonEmoticon